Prismatik CZ: Photo Gallery

January 9, 2007
 image
Michael DiTolla, DDS, FAGD
Prismatik CZ: Photo Gallery

The search for a high-strength, esthetic, biocompatible metal-free material that could be used for multi-unit frame works and single-unit restorations has been the focus of many R&D efforts during the last decade. Some dentists have wanted these materials to avoid the use of metals in the mouth, while most dentists have just wanted to provide the most esthetic restoration possible. Several materials have attempted to meet these needs, yet have fallen short of expectations. Laboratory tests have shown that the fracture toughness and flexural strength of zirconia are significantly higher than that of alumina or any other esthetic ceramic. Prismatik Clinical Zirconia (CZ)™ is the material used to fabricate zirconia understructures in the Glidewell Digital Manufacturing center. These CZ restorations meet or exceed the physical and esthetic properties of other current zirconia systems, while representing the best value in high-strength all-ceramic restorations.

In the last issue of Chairside®, we looked in depth at the physical properties and preparation guidelines for CZ restorations. In this issue I would like to take a closer look at a number of these cases rather than just focusing on one. I think you will see by looking through these cases that Clinical Zirconia is a versatile material that allows us to conventionally cement an all-ceramic restoration in nearly all clinical situations.

CASE A

Case A Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case A is a 37-year-old male with multiple failing composites, recurrent decay and broken incisal edges due to parafunctional activity. For these reasons, CZ crowns were a better choice than porcelain veneers.

Case A Figure 2

Figure 2: Even though the patient decided not to treat the entire arch, the CZ crowns on teeth #7–10 have made a significant esthetic improvement in his smile. Because of the zirconia coping, there is no possibility of a gray margin ever appearing.

Case A Figure 3

Figure 3: The close-up photograph of the CZ crowns on a black background highlights the natural incisal edge translucency of these restorations. The beauty of all-ceramics and the strength of a PFM is a winning combination.

CASE B

Case B Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case B consists of a full upper arch of CZ restorations. In addition to the other esthetic challenges that are present here, notice the shades of teeth #9 and #10, which have both been endodontically treated.

Case B Figure 2

Figure 2: The prep shade of the teeth are within normal limits, with the exception of teeth #9 and #10. The discoloration of these teeth presents a difficult esthetic challenge for all-ceramic restorations. While I might prefer to use an esthetic PFM such as Captek™ (Argen; San Diego, Calif.), the patient insisted on all-ceramic crowns.

Case B Figure 3

Figure 3: This lateral view of the finished restorations focuses on the discolored teeth, which have been completely blocked out by the CZ crowns. With all-ceramic restorations, it can be a challenge to get restorations to blend on a case like this.

CASE C

Case C Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case C consists of CZ crowns on teeth #8 and #9. Due to the dark shade of these endodontically treated teeth, it is not possible to use a pressed all-ceramic crown. Zirconia copings will keep the prep from showing through regardless of how dark they are.

Case C Figure 2

Figure 2: A digital X-ray of the CZ crowns at try-in shows how dense the underlying zirconia copings are; they almost appear to be metal. The X-ray is also used to verify the fit of the CZ crowns prior to cementation.

Case C Figure 3

Figure 3: With the CZ crowns backlit, the translucency of the crowns is apparent even though the copings are dense enough to block out the prep shades.

Case C Figure 4

Figure 4: The CZ crowns blend in well with surrounding dentition, and there is no fear that one day gray margins will appear if any gingival recession happens to occur.

CASE D

Case D Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case D is a 31-year-old male who was born without his left maxillary central incisor. Because there is no room to place an implant to replace this missing tooth, CZ crowns and Vivaneers™ no-prep veneers were used to correct the smile.

Case D Figure 2

Figure 2: The CZ crown placed on tooth #10 was shaped to look like tooth #9. The CZ crown placed on tooth #11 was shaped to look like tooth #10. The CZ crown on tooth #8 was reduced heavily on the mesial to move the midline back to the right. Vivaneers no-prep veneers were utilized to complete the smile.

CASE E

Case E Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case E is a 47-year-old female who has chewed through two cast gold crowns on teeth #2 and #3. Additionally, tooth #4 has a vertical fracture through the mesial marginal ridge and requires a full-coverage restoration as well.

Case E Figure 2

Figure 2: CZ crowns were placed on teeth #2–4 with no fear of fracture, due to its proven clinical record of high strength and longevity. As a result, all CZ restorations can be cemented with conventional cements such as 3M ESPE’s RelyX™ Luting Cement Plus (St. Paul, Minn.).

CASE F

Case F Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case F is a 29-year-old male with multiple failing interproximal incisors and recurrent decay on teeth #7–9. Tooth #10 had a failing PFM crown with a gray margin starting to appear on the facial.

Case F Figure 2

Figure 2: CZ crowns were placed on teeth #7–10 to accommodate the patient’s wish for “no more metal margins.” Vivaneers no-prep veneers were used on teeth #4–6 and #11–13 to finish the smile.

CASE G

Case G Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case G is a 25-year-old female who had endodontic treatment on teeth #7–9 due to accidental trauma. Because of concerns about the preps turning darker with time, it was decided to do CZ crowns on these teeth rather than veneers.

Case G Figure 2

Figure 2: CZ crowns were placed on teeth #7–9 and individual Vivaneers no-prep veneers were placed on teeth #4–6 and #10–13. The combination of all-ceramic crowns and no-prep veneers is an excellent way to enhance a smile.

Case H

Case H Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case H is a 37-year-old female with an existing PFM on tooth #8 with recurrent decay. She also doesn’t like how tooth #7 is severely rotated.

Case H Figure 2

Figure 2: CZ crowns were used on teeth #7 and #8 to improve the alignment and esthetics. We used Vivaneers no-prep veneers on teeth #4–6 and #9–12 to complete the smile makeover.

Case I

Case I Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case I is a 47-year-old female who was unhappy with several aspects of her smile. Her chief complaint was a PFM bridge from teeth #5–7 that had exposed metal margins on both abutments.

Case I Figure 2

Figure 2: An all-ceramic CZ bridge was placed on teeth #5–7 and single-unit CZ crowns were placed on #8 through #12. The patient no longer covers her mouth with her hand when smiling.

Case J

Case J Figure 1

Figure 1: Clinical case J is a 43-year-old male with multiple failing PFM crowns. Also, tooth #7 needs to be removed due to a failed endodontic re-treatment. Due to the patient’s dislike of exposed metal margins, we decided to use all-ceramic CZ restorations.

Case J Figure 2

Figure 2: We placed a three-unit CZ bridge from teeth #6–8 and single-unit CZ crowns on teeth #5 and #9–11. A laser was used to create an ovate pontic receptor site for the pontic on tooth #7. We were able to eliminate the metal margins and the open gingival embrasures with the new CZ restorations.