Course Objectives (2 CE Credits)
There are advantages and disadvantages to using a screw-retained vs. a cement-retained implant crown. It is important for the clinician to be aware of the pros and cons of each type of restoration when deciding which prosthetic design is most appropriate for a particular case. After reading this article, the clinician should understand the many important elements involved in choosing which crown to use, including:
- Retention and resistance
- Stress to bone and implant
When treating implant patients, choosing between a cement-retained and a screw-retained crown is a complex and comprehensive decision. Many components go into selecting which crown is best suited to a particular restorative situation. A thorough case-by-case analysis is necessary to determine the most appropriate prosthetic design.
CAUTION: When viewing the techniques, procedures, theories and materials that are presented, you must make your own decisions about specific treatment for patients and exercise personal professional judgment regarding the need for further clinical testing or education and your own clinical expertise before trying to implement new procedures.
- Goodacre CJ, Bernal GB, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complication with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:121-32.
- Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):375-9.
- Jorgensen KD. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13:35-40.
- Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub.; 1981. Principles of preparations; p. 79-96.
- Kaufman EG, Coelho DH, Collin L. Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold castings. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11:487-98.
- Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. Principles of cement retained fixed implant prosthodontics; p. 549-73.
- Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:28-35.
- Moscovitch M. Molar restorations supported by two implants: an alternative to wide implants. J Can Dental Assoc. 2001;67(9):535-9.
- Misch CE, Bidez MW. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. Chapter 38: Occlusal considerations for implant-supported prostheses: implant protective occlusion and occlusal materials; p. 609-28.
- Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont. 2008 Feb;17(2):92-6.
- Strong SM. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations? Gen Dent. 2008;56:15-8.
- Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Mar-Apr;15(2):239-46.
- Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations. Br Dent J. 2006 Oct 21;201(8):501-7.
- Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang HL. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant Dent. 2010 Feb;19(1):8-15.
- Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int Journal Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):137-41.