(800) 854-7256 Main  |  (855) 289-9657 Case Pickup  |  New Customer  |  My Account NEW

Implant Overdentures: A Superior, Cost-Effective Alternative to Traditional Dentures

Implant Overdentures - Dental CE Course
Launch Course

Course Objectives (1 CE Credit)

Timothy Kosinski, DDS, MAGD

While conventional dentures may enhance esthetics and offer some improvement in function for patients who have lost all their maxillary or mandibular teeth, they are inadequate for many patients due to discomfort, a diminished ability to chew and taste food, and the psychological impact of complete edentulism. Dental implants, on the other hand, can be predictably placed to support an overdenture, providing retention, added stability and an affordable alternative to conventional dentures. Compared to traditional complete dentures, implant-retained prostheses improve chewing capability, speech function, social confidence, comfort and emotional well-being. For dentists, delivering these benefits to patients can be extremely rewarding. Topics include:

  • Bone loss and the effect it can have on facial esthetics and self-esteem
  • Comparison of implant overdentures and traditional dentures
  • The benefits of implant overdentures
  • Discussion of careful diagnosis and treatment planning
  • CBCT scanning techniques and proper positioning of implants used to retain an overdenture
  • General protocol for determining the number of implants to place
  • Techniques for ensuring a more stable prosthesis


The implant overdenture is a cost-effective solution to complete edentulism and should be presented as one of the primary treatment modalities to edentulous patients. Compared to traditional dentures, implant overdentures provide better function, stability and quality of life for patients. What’s more, the restorative protocol is relatively easy to learn, presenting an accessible gateway to implant therapy as well as significant benefits to both the patient and practice.

CAUTION: When viewing the techniques, procedures, theories and materials that are presented, you must make your own decisions about specific treatment for patients and exercise personal professional judgment regarding the need for further clinical testing or education and your own clinical expertise before trying to implement new procedures.


  1. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil. 1979 Jan;6(1):41-8.
  2. Kapur KK, Soman SD. Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers. 1964. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jun;95(6):407-11.
  3. Singh H, Sharma S, Singh S, Wazir N, Raina R. Problems faced by complete denture-wearing elderly people living in jammu district. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC25-7.
  4. Papadaki E, Anastassiadou V. Elderly complete denture wearers: a social approach to tooth loss. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e721-7.
  5. Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Mostajeran Z, Fazel A, Eshkevari Ps. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(4):196-200.
  6. van der Bilt A, Burgers M, van Kampen FM, Cune MS. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures and oral function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Nov;21(11):1209-13.
  7. Hyland R, Ellis J, Thomason M, El-Feky A, Moynihan P. A qualitative study on patient perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. J Dent. 2009 Sep;37(9):718-23.
  8. Pan YH, Ramp LC, Liu PR. Patient responses to dental implant-retained mandibular overdenture therapy: a 6-year clinical study. Chang Gung Med J. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(4):363-9.
  9. Zembic A, Wismeijer D. Patient-reported outcomes of maxillary implant-supported overdentures compared with conventional dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Apr;25(4):441-50.
  10. Geckili O, Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Dayan C, Yabul A, Tuncer N. Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant-supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years. Spec Care Dentist. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):136-41.
  11. Turkyilmaz I, Company AM, McGlumphy EA. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2010 Mar;27(1):3-10.
  12. Kordatzis K, Wright PS, Meijer HJ. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):447-52.
  13. Institute for Dental Implant Awareness; Health Letter; 2000.
  14. Grogono AL, Lancaster DM, Finger IM. Dental implants: a survey of patients' attitudes. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Nov;62(5):573-6.
  15. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jan;37(1):98-110.
Prev Course
Next Course

Subscribing Has Its Perks!

Offers on products you may already use
Introductory offers on new products
Educational materials