Biologic Shaping: An Alternative to Extracting a Tooth with a Severe Fracture

May 8, 2012
 image
Daniel Melker, DDS
Biologic Shaping: An Alternative to Extracting a Tooth with a Severe Fracture Cover Image

When a cusp of a tooth is fractured subgingivally approximating the bone, extraction is a commonly considered treatment, due to concern about the significant bone removal required by other procedures to create space for the biologic width. That being said, addressing this primary concern of removing bone to create space for the biologic width presents the alternative procedure of biologic shaping.

The premise for traditional crown lengthening to preserve a fractured tooth is that the surgeon must remove enough bone, starting from the most apical portion of the fracture, to create space for the biologic width. This method can result in a significant loss of bone, tooth mobility and, if the fracture is located near the furcation, a compromised furcation area.

Biologic shaping offers an alternative to conventional crown lengthening through removal of the fractured portion of the tooth, allowing for a new biologic width to reform without significant removal of bone. The case presented here illustrates this technique.

Case Example

Figure 1

Figure 1: Provisional crown placed after the buccal cusps of tooth #30 fractured approximating the bone.

Figure 2

Figure 2: Removal of provisional crown to access the fractured tooth surface.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Reflected tissue verifying location of fracture into the furcation and approximating the bone.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Removal of fractured tooth surface using a coarse diamond bur.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Smoothing the tooth’s surface using a superfine diamond bur (40 microns) to completely remove the old fractured portion of the tooth surface.

Figure 6

Figure 6: Smoothing the root surface creates a parabolic architecture to mimic the soft tissue contours, allowing for a new biologic width to reestablish without having to significantly alter the bone.

Figure 7

Figure 7: After 12 weeks of healing and the establishment of the biologic width, a new crown was placed just coronal to the gingival collar. Notice that the location of the new margin is in perfect harmony with the adjacent teeth.

Conclusion

When performing traditional crown lengthening for a fractured tooth, the potential need to remove excessive bone to create space for the biologic width is cause for concern. Conventional thinking is to locate the apical location of the fracture and start removing bone from that point. With biologic shaping, however, the fractured portion of the tooth is removed first to preserve as much bone as possible. This conservative procedure can avoid excessive removal of bone and help preserve bone in the furcation area, leading to long-term stability and a successful restorative outcome.

Dr. Daniel Melker is in private practice in Clearwater, Florida, and lectures nationwide on periodontics. Contact him at 727-725-0100.